Skip to main content

Who does what

LeadershipProject sponsorsAdministrators
In one minute

A DataHub rollout needs five roles. Only one of them is technical.

The role that matters most, and is most often assigned wrongly, is the domain expert who says what the things in your operation actually are. That cannot be outsourced to a supplier or a data team, because it is the part only your own people know.

The five roles

RoleAccountable forTypically
SponsorChoosing the first question; unblocking access to source systemsOperations director, plant manager, COO
Domain expertWhat the things are and how they relate, the model itselfProcess engineer, maintenance lead, senior operator
Data stewardNaming conventions, data set boundaries, model quality over timeEngineering or asset-information lead
AdministratorUsers, permissions, retention, cost, uptimeIT / OT operations
IntegratorGetting data out of source systems and into DataHubAutomation engineer, systems integrator, or a developer

Small organisations routinely combine these, one person can be steward and administrator, and the sponsor is often also the domain expert. What does not work is having none of them, particularly the domain expert.

The mistake worth avoiding

The most common failure pattern in this category is this: the platform is bought by IT, the model is built by a supplier or an internal data team, and the engineers who actually know the plant are consulted at the review meeting.

The result is a model that is technically correct and operationally useless. It uses the categories a data modeller would choose rather than the ones the plant uses, so the people who were supposed to benefit look at it and do not recognise their own operation.

The model must be built by people who know the operation, using words the operation already uses. The platform's job, and DataHub's specific design goal, is to make that possible without those people needing to write code.

What each role does, week by week

Weeks 1–2 · Frame it

Weeks 3–6 · Model and land data

Weeks 7–12 · Answer the question, then widen

  • Domain expert and analysts answer the original question against the model, and document how.
  • Sponsor reviews the answer, and decides the second question.
  • Data steward captures what the first pass got wrong about the model and fixes it, this always happens and is a sign of a healthy project, not a failed one. Grown, not built →
  • Administrator sets retention and reviews cost. Data lifecycle →

How much time this actually takes

Realistic expectations, for a first project scoped to one site or one process area:

1–2 days
Domain expert, modelling
Spread over two or three sessions, not one marathon
~1 day
Administrator, setup
More if identity provider integration is new
Days
Integrator, per source
Depends entirely on how open the source system is
Ongoing
Data steward
A few hours a month once conventions are set

The integration work is the variable that dominates. A source system with an open API is a day; one that only exports CSV on request is a project of its own. Establish this early, it is the single biggest driver of how long a first project takes. Increasingly, some of this work is done by agents rather than people. Agents that build and run integrations →

When you need outside help

You do not need a supplier to run DataHub, and you should not need one to build your model. Outside help is genuinely useful for two things:

  • Connecting difficult source systems, particularly legacy control and historian systems with proprietary interfaces.
  • Facilitating the first modelling sessions, if your organisation has never done structured modelling before. The facilitator should be teaching your experts to do it, not doing it for them.

If a proposal has a supplier building your model and handing it over, that is the pattern described above, and it tends to end the same way.

Go deeper